If the price would not be

ProPlan Adult Original has been tested in the flavor rich in Chicken & Rice with our Golden Retriever. Unfortunately, these are not a proper test evaluation 1. Dog er hand. The dog did not respond to the real question of taste and try for yourself I wanted not for me
First positive impression was that the lining of Stiftung Warentest rated in 11/2010 with very good (1.2) and that there is a re-sealable bag with Fresh Zip (similar to the T * pp * ts freezer bag) ,
On the bag feeding recommendation is printed on the body weight of the dog. Side is then the composition of the feed with 20% chicken, 7% wheat, dehydrated poultry protein, maize and rice. Dried beet pulp, animal fat, corn gluten, autolysate, dried egg, fish oil, minerals, and additives (but that goes too far to the chemical) indicated. Are important / interesting I think the analytical constituents:
Protein: 26%
Fat content: 16%
Crude ash: 7.5%
Crude fiber: 2%
Omega-3 fatty acids: 0.3%
Omega-6 fatty acids: 2.7%.

The extent to which the cereal content speaks for or against the feed of a predator, every dog ​​owner must eventually decide the respective proportions, however, are stored similarly high in many dog ​​food manufacturers.

The food smells pleasant and not too intense for the human nose. Our dog has readily accepted. The on the packaging printed advantages (Pro Bifidus = healthy digestive tract, natural defenses by high content of vitamins E & C and (healthy) skin and (shiny) Fell by omega 3 & 6 fatty acids), I was able to confirm during the test phase neither nor refute. As far as I noticed no change, except for the fact that the stools were more frequent than with his usual food. His usual places he managed partly not more to achieve it
All in all, he has but the food well tolerated, readily accepted and even supported them no flatulence (which so far our reasons for a change of food were). However, we will stick to our previous fodder because it he is cheaper in (supply) equal to (bar) power in the price segment.