As the name suggests, Lightroom, the software works as a kind of digital darkroom. So she offers to catalog all your images in a library to 'develop' and editing, among other things the possibility. The technical foundation of all this is a RAW converter that allows you to perform all the changes, without running the risk of damaging the original files. Only the export is implementing all the changes carried out.
In order to use the software effectively, I recommend you to buy a good book on Lightroom 5. For myself, I had for Lightroom 4 Scott Kelby Lightroom 4 for digital photography: best practices for photographer (Pearson Photo) bought. Looking back, I can recommend this book for beginners. This book, however, drawn not by itself. If I were Lightroom newbie, I would also wait for the new edition Lightroom 5 digital photography.
____________________
What are the new features, and is well worth an upgrade?
a. The revised field repair, now also enables the large-scale correction of image distortion.
b. Identifying and removing dust succeed now also easier on the area visualization. The image is black and white, which even the smallest particles are visible.
c. The radial filter itself I could not deal, which is why I can say this, nothing.
d. My personal highlight is the newly added feature of automatic deskewing / erection converging lines.
As can be readily seen, I use only the last function regularly.
____________________
Conclusion: A program whose initial purchase without ifs and buts worth. Whether an update for you is worth, you need to decide at the end itself. I hope I could offer you a little help to do so. While I used to edit my photos with Photoshop Elements and Paint Shop Pro, I use this since I got to know Lightroom only this software. It offers under one roof everything I need for the development of my pictures. I myself have never actually even developed my analog images, have looked at two former friends but every now and again when developing on the Schultzer. The logic of Lightroom follows this path in many ways. In addition, I find the grain of the final image somehow more natural, unlike element and Paintschop Pro. This is ultimately but a question of taste.
Should you have any questions about specific points of my review, so I answer that like in the comments.
Should I still notice something negative or positive, so I'll mention this here.