A printed sheet is 177 mm x 100 mm in size. That's when the previous version with postcards printed exactly as in the current version of Logo. Packed the printed sheets are usually in containers to 18 pieces. I have placed each one container of the old version and the new version on the kitchen scales. Result: Both piles weigh around 78 grams (+/- 1 gram).
Now it is mathematically! Because in order to really be able to make a useful indication of the strength of the paper, should be parked on the weight per square meter of paper. 18 signatures weigh 78 grams, then weighs approximately 4.34 grams of. The area of 177 mm x 100 mm passes into a square about purely 56,5mal. So one square meter of paper weighs 245.21 grams (compared to copying paper has between 80 and 100 grams / m²). Assuming now assume that the previous version of the paper was difficult to actually 1 gram (18 per sheet), then we came to 248.035 grams per square meter, so the fabled weight difference of 2,825 grams per square meter! Per sheet that would be a difference in weight of 0.05 grams !!! And that feels someone "take in hand" by mere ??? (*** Minimal rounding differences may occur ***)
The "terrible" logo printed on the back:
The Canon logo is about 15 mm long and 3 mm in height and is repeated in several diagonal rows about 35 times. In fact, he is discreet, looks more like a watermark, but distinguishes itself by no means strikingly from the background. Using a commercially available pin on CDs the image can be wonderfully label. Lab images have indeed usually also the logo of Kodak, Fuji film, or who else on the back. When's it must be unconditional, but the Canon images can still be labeled as a postcard and send it.
For poorer color brilliance:
This is a three-color printers (CMY, black he has already made the other three colors zusammenmantschen) !!! Compared to most supermarket and drugstore-sublimation printers (same principle) makes this little device with this paper but still better prints. Assuming that most users of this printer neither use a color-calibrated monitor for image processing, even a little care about the white balance of the pictures, are statements about the "color brilliance" entirely subjective and useless. The images that come out there, suck completely as nice memory or for fast documentation. Professional photos pressure starts at four colors (CMYK) and listen well in 12 colors (in order to present even the finest color nuances).
For allegedly degraded paper handling through the printer (double-feed, etc.):
It should firstly be always made sure that the printer is kept clean, because it responds properly sensitive to dust and dirt. Second, which is often simply in the adhesion (after looking at Wikipedia!) Between the individual signatures. One knows the keep of plastic films on glass or other smooth surfaces without glue. Before you insert the paper into the printer, this simply loosen a few times like a deck of cards, then staring them usually together nothing more. But be careful not to tap on the side to be printed!
Why this might often times one sheet remains ?:
At each turning on the printer, the ribbon is a few millimeters advanced and thus smoothed back or stretched. The more often you do it, without printing, the more ink ribbon is used up and then it is often enough not for the maximum number of prints made. Actually, the ribbons are but tailored to the number of printed sheets supplied.
Four rather than five stars ...
... There is of me, because the product compared to laboratory images is not exactly cheap. So wait a minute but it works the business: If you do not want to wait and even want to make on Sunday after drinking coffee itself, you have to stop and pay extra something. And who says that fun is not something more may cost?
