Here's the pros and cons for HW300G:
+ Internal Media Player for USB media
+ HDMI to 1080p recognition
+ I get a very good picture to more than 2 meters diagonal
+ Very small and handy
+ Low power consumption thanks to LED
+ Will not very warm
+ Can be mounted on tripod
+ Nice and bright (more on that later)
+ Beautiful contrast
+ Sophisticated design
+ Rainbow effect remains limited
+ Long lamp life
- Audible loud, but I still have not seen projector, which is quiet
- No manual or optical zoom, ie I can resize the image only on the distance from the screen, making it inflexible
- The focus wheel is adjustable only with tact, as flutes goes through the low speed range, each fine-tuning
- Everything is stretched to 16:10 About the HDMI connection, what with 16: 9 aspect ratio looks ugly
As far as times all I can think to HW300G. Now on the subject brightness and contrast as opposed to models that are already marked with 500 lumens. On Youtube you can see comparison videos example from Acer K330 against LG HW300G and be recognized by the white picture a difference, but when color comes into play, which is the case in normal movies, then you realize it almost nothing.
Even the HW300G is remeasured pretty much at 300 lumens and 1000: 1 contrast ratio are also not fib.
In addition, it projects a sharper image than its competitors 500 lumens.
Now say many determined "yes 300 lumens are not really usable, unlike a conventional projector lumens 1500-3000". That may in displaying a white image agree, but LED has a different color representation and thus already ranging from 300 lumens to achieve a good image result which is sufficiently bright and unlike conventional projectors produces brilliant colors.
And seriously, I never use a projector in a darkened room.
That's as far from me, I pull him from 2 stars for the 16:10 Bug, the lack of zoom and the bad focusing ability of the image, otherwise it is a great projector.
