Is the description wrong? My trousers have a print at the hem with UPF 40+ (see photo no. 2).
DIMENSIONS: [: -] length: 110 cm [: -] covenant flat: 37 cm [: -] leg flat: 23 cm
(+) With jeans I W33 / L30. These pants fit me just so; So tailored for slim types. If the material was not extensible, it would be too narrow (my waist circumference: 86 cm)! But it is on the legs a bit too long (my size: 172 cm). However, the legs can be contracted in such a way that the rubber bands are not seen. (For me, they are still a bit too long.)
(+) The seams are set clean. At this the loops are reinforced, at the ends of the zippers also. On the inside of the fly is also amplified below. Zip, Velcro and rubber bands are functional, unobtrusive and high quality.
(+) The wear is comfortable, the pants are airy and light.
(+ / O) Even if the substance is wet, it feels good, pleasant to. And he actually dries in a few minutes. The pockets above the knee and are Podex of reticulated, finely anfühlendem, lightweight fabric. Great are the bags are all not comfortable already.
(O / -) The bottom side pockets are designed so that the contents tend to slip backwards. When setting it is quite possible that you sit on the content.
(-) What is unpleasant (at least for me), are the places where the legs are detachable: Scrub / itch slightly, which I find annoying. ('m Generally at something sensitive.)
[___FAZIT ___]
Lightweight (325 g), comfortable trousers with well-made bags. Something scratchy in the separation of the pant legs. Therefore, 4 *. (The anti-mosquito function I can not verify.)
EDIT (after 4 weeks):
Must put down the rating of 4 to 3. The area of separation convinced me from wearing not (see above).
