Format
Moleskine - that says it all. Super processed, rough, beautiful cover design - just anything but cheap.
Functionality
As a Vorrezensionist already wrote: it is planned to 6 books per letter. 6 books? How many Facebook journal should I use the parallel? It would have been appropriate to dispense with the subdivision by letter (my girlfriend I gave the tip, simply cut off the grid and chronologically to use). Furthermore, it would have been possible if it had waived the "Notes" pages at the end.
The sites are well laid out, where everything is in English and act some subtitles useless. For example, it is rather interesting that edition I read. Space does then also all only for a brief summary + opinion. For five stars are intended to fill that serve as evaluation. If it is sufficient one, then that is certainly okay. But I think just in books a slightly finer evaluation system attached.
Overall it can be said that there is certainly more favorable than / equal expensive Book Journals out there that offer more space for the individual books. As for processing, but this should not come close to Moleskine. Especially if you intend that Book Journal carrying around a lot with it, you should tend to Moleskine, others use compared well much faster.