Not much faster than 500 Mbit competition, but inexpensive.

I want to combine two rooms, between which I can lay no cable. Wi-Fi was the previous solution, but with 2-3 MB / s bit slow for the transport on the NAS. Therefore, I have read me on Powerline and quickly learned that the data rates specified values ​​are more dream. In order to have comparability, two systems have been ordered: CSL 900 Mbit / s and Fritz 510E (500 MBit / s). Both were tested in the same building, with the CSL system was additionally tested directly into the wall outlet, which is not at the Fritz system.

The Results:
Data Transfer (1 file, 1597 KB):

Fritz 510E
Time: 192 s -> ~ 8.3 MB / s

CSL (at the same outlets)
Time: 190 s -> ~ 8.4 MB / s

CSL (on wall sockets)
Time: 173 s -> ~ 9.2 MB / s

Energy consumption
Fritz: Standby: CSL: Standby: 1-2 W, operating: 2-3 W

Since both systems are priced almost the same, I decided for the CSL, but by virtue of the integrated socket (there is also of AVM, but much more expensive).

The CSL-system generated as described several times very high-frequency sounds, but so quietly that it's hearing a> 30-year-olds can not perceive from one meter away. The 900 MBit / s are a daring assertion. Given the marketing to the "well-known competitors" of better value here would be 600 Mbit / s have been.
Who live with the favorable Fritz devices (or Devolo or TP link or ...) with no outlets and they can place directly on the wall, perhaps hereby guarantee (drives better, also because two years with AVM eg How long are not guaranteed CSL warranty), unfortunately the accompanying documents or the Internet can not be removed,