Have bought the bag 10 days ago, tested in a short break and ask myself: How can such a relatively bulky Canon product for an optimized regarding size and performance and offer unrivaled camera like the S95? -> The bag carries on too thick (40 mm without belt loop at 29mm camera depth) -> The camera and bag are above about 4 mm air (in my pocket due to manufacturing tolerances behind 1-2mm over front). This may concern for the S100 with 60mm height, but not for the lower 2mm S95 -> Incomprehensible: The bag must be completely removed for photographing. Why was provided in the price no folding back shell, which releases the display?
For material quality: leather or imitation leather? I could not figure it out. Canon is silent on this. The usual label for leather missing. From "soft" in any case no trace.
Practical to use and clear benefits compared to cheaper competition Bags: The magnetic closure.
