Many Olympus fans will grumble now, but after extensive, every 2 months of testing, I can come to no other conclusion. And, although I like Olympus grundätzlich me is the lens ecosystem sympathetic, the jpgs and the in-body Stablilisierungssystem. Nevertheless: The E-P5 has a wicked Shutter shock. Whether that can now anyone understand or not, for me it was. 1/3 of all images blurred. That was a good 10 Months As until Olympus decided to on the firmware inserted auxiliary solution. It has therefore launched a high-end camera to then 1,100 on the market that does not blur-images put together. If that's not a bad design, then I do not know what should be a. Now with the FW-Fix it goes, but that is an auxiliary solution, it works, but never should be necessary and if so, then they would have to come within 2 months. Overpriced it is today noch- nearly 800 old for a 1.5's camera. In the current competition far too expensive. The stabilization works MMN much worse than expected. I have a Nikon lens of about 2008, which cost around 200 and has an equally effective stabilizer. So because I had expected more from the acclaimed 5-axis stabilization. He is also extremely loud, at first I thought it was a failure, but that's way it is. Bottom line, I have returned clear. Unfortunately, I'm going to turn now quite of Olympus, since the successor does not leave any new sensor expect (if the E-M5 MkII look at) and the 4: 3 format is already unattractive for my taste, I always take pictures in 3: 2 or 16: 9, there remain only ann 12MP left, what with all the discussion about pixel mania nowadays is very little when you consider how great are the Obejktive in the system.
