Plug is different, nose demolition jeopardized cable is different

(Noted and already by vorigem reviewers) As at the set of Picture seen the cable has displayed other than plug in the product image. The protection of the nose does not go beyond the nose, but is shorter, so the risk of breakage of the nose is higher. The connector is also partly made of metal instead of plastic as shown, so not quite 'nice red' as another reviewer wrote. Also the bend protection is very different, and is too rigid. This makes the cable then bends at the end of the kink protection, rather than being uniformly bent.

In my experience, the breaking off of the nose in> 90% of cases is responsible for the death of a cable. As standardized network cable otherwise hardly differ, the male is the essential purchase criterion, and probably the main reason not to grab a better plug in this case for most on commodity returns, which only costs a fraction.

It should be noted that the cable labeling CAT 6 carries, although only as a CAT 5e sold (measured I have not). In practice, however, this is almost always matter because Gigabit works over CAT 5e with an unchanged data rate. Only with cable lengths from 100m which plays a role. The cable is relatively stiff and can be bad loss for small radii.

Effectively another, lower quality is delivered (as far as the connector) in this product easy. I wonder why such a product objectively despite strong deviation from the description (to the flat belongs also the image) by most other reviewers 5 Star gets. Presumably, the product was recently replaced without changing the description, or there are different cables sold under the same name. I do not want to hope that the majority of reviewers is biased.