The display is bright and brilliant, but still strong natural colors, more visible in sunlight as in Note 1, the resolution I find perfectly adequate. The performance of the device and the operability of the touch screens are very good, clearly faster and more fluid than 1 at my touch That's really fun.
For camera: I photograph for years with DSLR and system cameras and think the quality of photos on a good 24-inch monitor to assess. Even in 1: 1 display on the PC monitor (which really no one needs in a smart phone) I can not see any benefits for the staff 1. On the contrary, with the many special programs such as HDR, night mode, etc. you can take pictures that are not so possible with the touch. Another advantage is for me the true 16: 9 presentation of Mega, ie on a conventional 16: 9 monitor or television the images are displayed in full format. When note remain on the sides black bars, I suppose here is rather shown 16:10. It is also striking that the music whenever the lighting conditions give with F 2.6 and ISO 32 photographed, the Mega contrast with the same aperture, but ISO 80, which in such cases represent more than twice as fast shutter speeds for the Mega. Good for subjects in motion or simply to prevent camera shake.
One point is I have noticed yesterday: When tracking my cycling eg Sport Tracker, the Mega features the driven forest paths despite the current strong foliation clearly precisely according as the score 1 over the winter months, which suggests a better GPS reception.
The fact that the Grade 3 superior in some respects, I like to think, after all, it is Samsung's current model of the upper class and costs correspondingly more. Who but an inexpensive phablet with a huge and very good looking display, which is also performed well during the Mega my opinion right. I bought my device the way through Amazon Warehouse as new at a reasonable price, this is certainly a good tip to save a few euros.