However, what the specified capacity concerns (1500 mAh) I have doubts. Of course I did not test laboratory is available and therefore can not come up with concrete measurements. However, as I my Nikon intense use (AW100) and that is through the GPS feature quite a power-hungry, I had over the last 14 months a fairly consistent usage profile.
I can not tell the difference between the life of the original battery and two spare batteries. That's more or less the same. The Ramozz the battery should have a 50% higher capacity than the Nikon battery may perhaps agree under certain test conditions. But in practice it is nothing to feel ....
The batteries are but certainly worth the money and in terms of price of the Nikon Batteries price / value for money
Conclusion:
++ Replacement for the original battery - Ideal
++ Price / performance - Very good
+ Kapaziät than the original Nikon - OK
- Kapaziätsangabe (1500 mAh) - probably exaggerated
