Setting up the device is easy - really easy to find the password "888888" in the instructions.
With the standard configuration, but it has given a very bad connection with us. Several seconds delay -. Just one image every 30-60sec.
Obviously, our "power grid" already "contaminated" by a neighbor with Powerline. After the shift away from the "standard" to "alternative encryption" (see instructions) it went very well => liquid picture and sound transmission with a delay of max. 1 sec. => You can live with! The night vision capability seems to be very good.
Why I forgive only one star?
The Smart Control 300 provides the "convenient way" via mobile Internet access continues to keep in touch even when you leave the local wireless. This works well and without any installation effort.
And that's where the rub is. For this to work well with the usual in private households dynamic IP addresses, the device must probably connect to build outside the currently assigned IP (or even the AV stream) to a server (at NUK?) Transfer, where it app on can retrieve your smartphone. How could the smartphone else know which IP it should contact.
To this end, but there is no single reference to the operating instructions or during installation of the app on your smartphone!
Are you crazy !! ?? !!
Proper handling of the data of other looks different!
If one sets out the DSL cable on Rooter starts the system after the camera is plugged into the mains without any problems and the connection with the smartphone app is automatic.
When the Rooter (Fritz box) the NUK access to the Internet blocking (because you want to remain in control of their own data) can no connection between NUK and smartphone also be built in the local network.
When you open the lock and locks them briefly then again moves the camera up and the system works locally as long as until the NUK briefly disconnected from the mains. (Stakeout for position change, power failure or simply because it sets out in the daytime)
Then you would have to re-unlock shortly.
As the NUK recognizes that is locked and not only the cable can possibly fathom IT professionals lack.
A lock of connection to the outside via the rooter is therefore not sensible to implement. The only possibility would be an additional Rooter of a separate Wi-Fi only for the NUK is not providing any DSL connection has. => Actually, but we wanted to reduce the radiation exposure.
Another thing about Android Apps. This ran on a Galaxy Note LTE in 2014 and a rooted Galaxy S3 here but wanted to superuser privileges !! (For which please ???) on a non gerootetem Galaxy Note 3 they immediately crashed after takeoff from always.
Who all do not mind, and anyway does not matter whom Privacy gets a nice monitor with features that you can probably use less for care of children but for completely different things for a lot of money. (Eg recording on SD card, mobile access)
That at this price the speaker is not present and if necessary must be purchased separately is embarrassing.
If anyone here from NUK reads:
Brings at last a baby monitor on the market, in which the microphone can be positioned close to a few meters of which have a cable to the baby and the radio unit. As far as the jack socket together really does not cost now. The field strength in the crib would reduce it significantly.
In addition, would also be times a halfway directed radiation helpful, if it is marked on the housing. Only in a few cases, the children's room is exactly centered in the house. Even that would probably some spare our babies to unnecessary radiation exposure.