The real reason was the better and more versatile audio features of the Denon,
he may additionally SACD and DVD-Audio aaand his tonal liveliness has the further
Given point, which is why the Panasonic declined. The Denon sounds just
awesome on, more detailed and finer than the Panasonic. Even as a CD player Spare he is
to use. It starts up fast, you hear nothing from the drive and it swings
not, but what is also known by Denon, everything installed dibasic. Panasonic
is also known for quality products and that is the 500 too! (Only this low design :( bad)
As ashamed my VT50 that the 500 is also from his family;)
Many complain because of the few connections, but let's face it, who buys Hifipurist nen
Multi device? No one who hears analog, also CDPlayer purchased separately.
But when we come to the most important category with a BD player, the image.
I must say, I've found no appreciable difference.
Both players have in cooperation with the Panasonic 65 "TV for open mouths
made with my visitors, whether 2D or 3D. For the DVD playback quality
I can not say anything, I look no more DVDs :) That would NEN 65 "ne
Insult, haha. Is m. M. still Analogtv watch: P
The few networking capabilities do not bother me, as any other device, TV, AVR can do that,
because I need it not in BD also. The services that have offered on the
Remote control buttons with their own symbols, what I find super.
Conclusion: Both devices are super image masters that are priced in the middle class, but technically
are settling far higher. The better audio capabilities, the slightly better tone and before
especially the design were the decisive factors for the Denon.
I can recommend both units with a clear conscience, but would advise everyone to Denon,
because he simply small bissel Special has more.
