Packaging and dosage
Mini-Tube with screw cap, content 15ml, Art 82387, not to be confused with Cellular Anti-aging cell renewal Intensive Serum in the flameproof donor, with 40 ml of currently 12.95 (Item No. 82388).
I confess that both products are confusingly similar, and this scent Plain and is much more expensive with the designation "eye care". Therefore, it is even worse with 3 stars from me than the 40 ml dispenser.
Both are white, semi-creamy, semi-liquid, adhere very well, can be distributed well and are taken very rapidly. Frankly, I realize there is no difference, so my description is the same for both variants.
Rubbed on the fingertip both products feel very bold, I mean very rich. They also make no Rollwürtschen when rubbed. On paper towels both creams leave a very light transparent stain, so are not really fat like oil, but still very rich, such as such as coconut butter.
A little pea under each eye causes a pleasant cooling effect that lasts about one minute. When I (No. 84703) got through too much Nivea Q10 Energy Eye Roll-on redness and burns to the eye bags, the creams have caused rapid cooling and healing within 24 hours. So they are much less aggressive.
The skin feels nice and smooth in comparable as well polished leather, at least for a few minutes. It was not until a second Ebse about 5 minutes after I get the impression that the skin is supplied tired (especially under the eyes) and that the effect really lasts a little longer.
The difference between the two products is (except in the price and quantity) mainly in the publication. When 40 ml dispenser you put a pea cream onto your fingertip in the 15 ml tube allows the long syringe a direct and very precise application in the skin folds. That is my opinion, however, the extra cost is not worth.
The wrinkles and bags in my ü 65-Haut are still there of course, but I have after 10 daily user subjectively the impression of a minimal relief. In case of skin irritation, the effect is more pronounced and noticeable.
Perhaps the anti-wrinkle effect is created when using the cream from 30 several times a day. I can not judge.
In any case, it will be a ruinous option over the years, which is expected to come more expensive than the beauty surgeon.
What is also very important: So far I had no burning and watering of the eyes. Most face creams eyes water for hours.
CONCLUSION
Both products, I consider high for quality, however, miss the target funds of skin tightening - at least after a few weeks. Maybe if they last a lifetime used intensively, which I can not judge.
The 40 ml dispenser gets me 4 stars, this expensive 15 ml tube (Art. 82387) I personally too expensive and in effect not fundamentally different kind. 822,388th There are 3 stars at the price maybe justifiable.
