Slim is not super slim ...

It is a cheaper filter, more resistant glass. This means that the compensation is not quite as good as in other: We see a rel. strong green reflection (light source: LED lamp), stronger than that of the lens. This may possibly have a negative impact on the contrast of the recording.
(In my other filters (Pantna, Hoya) I see some not at all, that's because drinn ne disc, as well, the remuneration to be (which one does also called "anti-reflective").

This is only a "slim", not "super slim". That means you screwed ran another filter, this can result in a wide-angle rather shadowing.
The margin is based on 3,55mm, the entire ring is 5,96mm high. Until there are glass front front 2,94mm and 1,21mm from the inside, which is a glass-thickness of
5,96-2,94-1,12 = 1.90mm results. (62mm filter)

For the price "better than nothing" and in high quality shots should remove such filters anyway, since digital cameras for UV weitgehned are blind, unlike analog film.