Uff. I actually tend to take a different form of communication, especially when I try to describe something or explain. In this case, please forgive me that I have no words, as the writers fared similarly obvious. The almost unlimited possibility of underlying philosophy about the "humanity" to provide an adequate scenery was not even attempted in the approach to use. The hint of evolutionary development remains with the very worn saying that "life will always find a way" exhaled and then comes, after all, the film remains true to the fact, nothing. If I could tell at least from a superficial action, but even that is not possible for me. Isaac Asimov's base from 1950, "I, the Robot", was demoted to two rules of robotics, the remainder trickles into the sand, in which the principal (in terms of time) of the film contrived and lengthy one tried to counter theatrical end forces , Too bad that was not something any one of the parties could be proud of. Those looking for depth, finds this only in the impressions of shoes Antonia Bandera's in the desert sand. But all this remains only my subjective impression. I was expecting something else. You, dear reader, can come to a completely different result. Depending on what you are looking to find.