PROFAX seems to be the importer; on the packaging is BABY brand or in the small print on the back Manufacturer: Digital Technology Shanghai skina. In addition, an oval silver 3.0 Holo sticker decorates the cover, suggesting a version name, but can also be a further indication of the 3-inch size.
I bought in order to protect the product, the display of an RX100. The original display of the camera is non-reflective quality, so it can be used in the sun and is relatively insensitive to fingerprints (one / two wiper with a microfiber cloth and they are gone).
I bring to the aforementioned screen protector, so I get a display with completely different properties. The 0.5mm thin material reflects light, especially in lateral sunlight clearly deteriorating the view of the camera screen. In addition I have uploaded two sample photos. You are in the product description below the product image and show the semi-mounted display protective in direct comparison to the original display. In addition, the protective glass attracts fingerprints magically and banishes this quite strong: it can no longer be with one / two, but with four / five wipers again remove. In contrast to the original state is here without microfiber cloth nothing because everything else smeared fingerprint only with visible streaks.
The aim was, in my view >> By using a display protection I want to achieve that a well coated display does not lose its properties by the usual abrasion. The advertised product but here I get a protection that makes the good qualities from the outset to naught. What for? To be in a few years can advertise for a resale with an original display well-preserved? So at least the subsequent user of a good display benefits?
I want to not only preserve the good qualities of a display, but use mainly self. I can only when the screen protector has the same good qualities. This is not given by far. However, on an older or less expensive display, the difference probably turn out lower than on the display of current and high-quality camera.
The idea is basically good, so bypassing a glass but the annoying problem with the bubbles in the protective films offered as an alternative. There is another point. If you can live with the problems described, will be happy with the product. The show the numerous good reviews. Due to the insufficient quality of the material for me but I can not recommend the product.
