The first book on philosophy to read, not less

Contrary to the apologists blinded Derrida, Bourdieu, Foucault and Lacan could still dare to claim, and as those who have worked to bring their honest criticism did not fail to recognize it (please refer to the article " Y'a he thought 68? "published in issue 39 of the journal The Debate), this major return on the thought of the great figures" intellectual "of the 60 and 70 is distinguished by its honesty, and n ' omit not mentioned, the clarity of his speech and finesse of his argument. It is the authors' approach is radically unknown practitioners of intellectual terrorism, since it is internal criticism "a criticism which begins with identifying, in an author, type of real design in question , then left, obviously, to show what dead or what difficulties may lead to us the choice and management of such a conception of reality, "says Alain Renaut in the article cited above.

Derrida, Bourdieu, Foucault and Lacan is not folded with a backhand on the absence of the signified, the social position of contemporary episteme, on the unconscious, in a word on this that the author would unwittingly. It is understood and returned and worked from within to demonstrate the limits, saying it must still to retain, as needed honesty to recognize that nothing is ever thought to anything .. . even if it is sometimes little.

No doubt the truth is difficult to hear. On this reading, how can we not rejoice never have pledged allegiance to these great thinkers, as we conceive the pain we would feel to come back? Is that it would then realize that we were wrong, the philosophists who abused our ignorance of philosophy into thinking that we could think without her because she died while she was in principle of their own reflections. The thought shot 68, it would be nothing left for us think about the world that our ignorance. Priests who dazzle their followers by light always hide them how to make fire. They disappeared, disciples can certainly afraid to get lost in the night.

To complete this reading, one can read "Why Bourdieu" Nathalie Heinich which honestly makes a return to the one she was the disciple so long to come back while others preferred not to deviate from the way that their master had drawn for them to nothingness.