Well I love the products with performance that can be tested and there is quite telling as a test: I threw in the bug 14,672 files totaling around 4GB to see what it gives.
FYI a USB 2.0 works with USB 2.0 ports at a speed not stupendous. The USB 3.0 ports are faster but requires a USB 3.0 for use in performance and this view has a key advantage: it is also compatible with USB 2.0 for mobility on older devices. And that's good because I have both on my computer. By cons, if you have only USB 2.0 ports bin it will not outperform a 2.0. (For details, look at the color in the port, it must be blue for a 3.0 port as in the key)
To transfer these files, you must:
_2 Hours and 40 minutes USB 2.0
_28 Minutes USB 3.0
And here it is in writing, much slower.
In reading, my computer displays almost instantly when browsing files over a USB 3.0 port.
Its other big advantage is its size precisely: it is a shrimp.
Level design: it is indicated glossy finish but in fact it is brushed aluminum so I do not understand. I find it very pretty brushed. It is a block and it's tough. Account scheduled holding of its size to be hung somewhere, no risk of losing once fixed because it is a single block. And she does not bend. And the advantage of this format is that you can paste multiple one next to the other as it does not exceed any laterally into the USB port.
Frankly no fault found, it is nickel.
