The Uncut referrence

I wanted this comparatively favorable magazine from London (12x8, - makes 1 time in 96, -) recommend times.
I read the magazine from the very beginning, ie since the mid-90's. And it is at the same time also an archive for future reference or the enclosed CD also has such a good quality that actually for everyone should always be there. UNCUT is not 100% current reporting, but has a very nice broad retro range. Remains to add that the whole concept seems absolutely industrial-independent even today; So the authors have a free hand and you learn over time also to interpret the writing.
Negative criticism, which included a realignment of a few years ago, I can not share. With one exception, the basic concept has always maintained or only slightly modified; just on the standard, as it simply require unwritten laws of the market from time to time. Can also be that a short time was driven a few years ago in favor of reporting Larger downshell area PhotoPrints little too sharply, but that is adjusted. There was a time when the film part was in the Uncut detail; now this is again reduced. To my knowledge there from the publisher an extra film-Zeitung; Therefore one must say but from our film: It is, unfortunately, still nothing about the Cahiers du Cinema, with regard to the independent reporting of all genres; because the British could not score! Never!
As for the total field of music, and indeed the entire last century, both print and on the moderate side dishes CD account, Uncut is unbeatable. There are from time to time real inspiration even from the 30-ies and 20-ies and there are sometimes real independents presented from the 40-ies, for example, the Beatles and the Stones have influenced ...

So for music connoisseurs is a subscription comfortable and relatively cheap. And it's all very easy to write, so with dictionary casually lying understands everything well.