Unobtrusive practically - matt-transparent tape

I use matt-transparent tape very happy if I want something safe, cover, without notice, as in the conventional high-gloss bands. Advantageously, the z. B. for overposting of tear strip "kartonierter envelopes when this kind of opening is not desirable, as a security measure, so to speak. Another advantage of this type of adhesive is that eventually taped elements of writing, such as letter addresses remain legible . And with an appropriate pen, eg. as a CD-Writer, you can even describe the film smudge-proof, an advantage of the matte surface.

This volume of Scotch meets these key features and also has a few other advantages:
+++ It is very economical: 33 m on a roll! Since you have ausgesorgt with comprehensive 8 rolls pack for some time. The width is 19 mm in approximately in the range of the ordinary. But beware: The role has a fairly large diameter (about 60 mm). In my mini dispenser not fit into it.
+++ It does not stick very well, the adhesive is also very finely dispersed. In the tape of another manufacturer previously used by me the adhesive surface is applied as a grained skin structure. Stuck arise easily small air pockets that you have to flatten tedious. Not so with this band that adheres immediately evenly.
+++ Class I find that - is made the carrier material (cellulose acetate) to 82% of recycled cardboard - according to the manufacturer's instructions. So it's less "artificial" by its material properties.
+++ It can roll very well and seems to be slightly thinner than comparable adhesive. Caution is advised if you, want it without the help of a scooter, roll up by hand. It can easily tear in the longitudinal direction. For the common use in the dispenser, it is ideal.
- - - Not so great I think the artificial smell that emanates the adhesive. The bothers me not really. The peace of mind that you can have in the face of high recycling rates, thereby unfortunately towards "Since chemical's inside" again withdrawn. But as I said, that's just an impression. I assume that the fragrance is not an expression of toxicity or the like.