Vacuum cleaners for people with lots of time, money and fitness ambitions

The vacuum cleaner is "extremely" low, which represents a major advance for our previous almost 10-year-old AEG "Hell suckers". The suction on hardwood and tile is good (which is not difficult), satisfactory on carpet. Said our assessment of "take dirt" is "satisfactory". Stiftung Warentest has the Siemens yes rated better. Maybe it just does not create vacuum cleaners better absorb fluff of high- and low-floor carpets.

Parquet, tiles, also deep-pile carpet, that's all right. But on all niederflorigem carpet comes the suction power equal to a debacle. Hair and lint, which hook into the carpet fibers are pushed together by Düsenfilz, but the airflow is sufficient undoubtedly insufficient to then absorb these Fusselfront. This is probably due to the system, a price that is due to the lower performance and the associated lower power consumption. The air flow through the nozzle is different than previous suction with higher performance, the far less very firmly drawn at the carpet.

Who can invest more time and more (weeks) Manpower for one square meter of carpet niederflorigen who gets 5.0 the ground somehow clean with the Siemens Q, but my wife still wishes ardently back our old 2000W AEG Vampyr.

Annoying is also the dust bag holder. Maybe it's intent from Siemens, but except Siemens original bags or almost as expensive of Swirl can be fixed reliably in the hakeligen fixing any we know other and cheaper dust bag that there is no risk that triggers the dust bag and the all sucked dirt the engine or at least protecting filter destroyed. Moreover, anther-level indicator is so unreliable that they have to open the vacuum cleaner frequently to see if the bag is not full or not properly secured.