Are packed in a story like this complex political developments more easily understood. You are more memorable than any newscast. In short, the (previously on Sudan only rudimentarily informed) reader learns much about this conflict. Dave Eggers has fashioned the biography of Achak Deng artfully into a novel. Reading the book, despite the more than 500 pages very entertaining.
The problem of the book is obvious. Eggers would like to inform this novel the Western reader on the (South) Sudan. In the novel, consequently, much is "explained" (Achak tells his story fictional American counterparts). The informational intent is more than clear. At the same time the novel is unmistakably an artifact. Much will arrange and condense within the meaning of the story. This means that one can not distinguish between fiction and non-fiction as a reader.
As with Eggers novel "Zeitoun" me has the moral exemplarity and gesellschafltiche integrity of the protagonist increasingly annoyed. It seems that Achak has no flaws. Of course Eggers must set the "donors" of his stories a positive monument. Otherwise no one would cooperate with him. However, given the novels not as good.