Generally, the ultrasound technology is a common method for cleaning purposes, eg in the jewelry industry. This in combination with the good rating, 4/5 Star, has convinced me. When the ratings but by a closer look, it soon becomes clear that this probably to a large extent (!) Are not real. Simply click on the profiles of those who evaluated and can quickly see that it has awarded the series 5 star products and thereby copy & paste to use for the comments - a good example is the comment in front of my. Against real act evaluators who awarded less star and this is also justified in detail.
Why am I ever come into doubt was the performance of the toothbrush. The description says that this will only work with our own toothpaste - which is a lie surely because ultrasound has only -irgendein- medium (so is jewelry such as washed in a water bath). The advertised Blaeschenbildung could also be realized without ultrasound technology - a marketing gimmick? It makes it also very thoughtful, that the toothpaste is during the first 1-2 minutes hardly dissolved and suspended in the mouth somewhere, but not where it is, let alone build a "connection" between the tooth and brush, where the waves better walk along (and / or bubbles form) can. The same applies to the teeth in the upper jaw, where the toothpaste logically falls by gravity down. During my tests were not hit my teeth covered with foam, which is to form bubbles appear, which will implode - rather the opposite. The whole thing becomes clear when it simply during brushing observed, like also with his mouth open. It quickly becomes clear that it can not work!
5 star would give it here only for Amazon, for one-time service and redemption!
// PS my first review - I was so disappointed with this product that I would like to keep other users from being taken in by it. Me is almost more important, however, prevent the company from further profit with these methods.
// PPS The ultrasound technology in toothbrushes since 3-4 years is now on the market. If it Waehren such a breakthrough improvement and technology, is written like this, why has not directly driven all other methods of the market? Why it makes the large, established manufacturers have totally cold? A small suggestion for thought ..
// PPPS I also venture to predict that, after this bad review, direct and timely "appear" again one or more good reviews, as it has always been the case. The large number of total existing reviews should with such a product also thought-provoking.
