A fair analysis but so light

Mr Camus writes well but his political analysis is strange. It notes the change of people in France, show the interest of society, to lower educational level, ignorance of our history but refuses to believe in a conspiracy theory which incidentally is not a since all is said when one seeks a little. He says that obviously people a coupe of its history is let go to oblivion, he noted that the French people disappears but refuses to believe that he is deliberately cut off from its roots so that it disappears. The coincidence blindingly obvious but it does not see.
What is the purpose of this change in people? The author does not respond because it refuses to believe the obvious.
At the end there is a speech for Marine Le Pen, in which he says he is finally ready to vote FN. And he says he does not necessarily agree on certain issues like the economy. Mr. Camus does he stay in the euro therefore continue to borrow from private banks? It is no agreement either on the position of FN vis-à-vis Europe but precisely europe imposing mass immigration. Mr. Camus therefore takes the media discourse (which passage are held in France by 4 families: Bouygues, Lagardère, dassaut, Rotschild either left the bank, right weapons) down the line but because he wants to switch FN France remains the French.
Finally, he always flees the FN Jean-Marie Le Pen "precisely because it was Le Pen" (yet the media discourse) without further argument although not her.
I think Mr. Camus writing talent, but he has a open and one eye closed. A third star for the opportunity through this book to raise awareness to the French one is disappearing.
1.8 children / women in France, a birth rate more than 2 times higher in the suburbs (close to 4 / female): in how many minorities will be the majority time? It is only a matter of time. The book "submission" is prescient.