a plausible reading of malaise

Well, if you read the back cover it is pleasant to think that the content of this test from Philippe Val risk move convictions or at least shake them. On reading it is clear that our man has things to say and some litigation to uncover. If the analyzes are interesting, they are sometimes supported by convoluted reasoning, not always easy to understand and a certain fatigue in systematism references in the long run. Moreover, the facts are they always accurate because a different with "Chained Duck" is not in its archives, so doubts! For the rest, so that reading of the legacy of our culture Rousseau opposed Voltaire through the lights to land on the revolution sense.