But cons I must say it was a nice break :)
A little pompous in the first pages (probably the opponents they have their weapons), the atmosphere loosens quickly to plunge us into a real borders between two hearts, where the outspoken, sometimes vulgar - but altogether cordial offers an entertaining and almost enjoyable show.
Soral is incisive, Naulleau is phlegmatic. We quickly attaches to the two protagonists seeing how consistently they defend their certainties (a rarity in our time) ...
The book is fairly short (under 300 pages), but it is enough because it borders to the dialogue of the deaf. Quite simply, Soral and Naulleau do not understand. They both understand French, but their hearts are ignorant, cross without seeing. Everyone is trying to fathom what there is in the head of the other could not.
Interesting is it, then, for the reader, to stand between them to be draw by bit the picture of our current philosophical debate in France: the conspiracy, the Jewish lobby, the gas chambers, all these hot topics overflowing into the small screen via Dieudonné case are they serious matters of interest only or crazy?
I greatly appreciated the spirit of this debate and hopes that it serves as an example for all opponents of the world.
By cons, no need for a suite on Soral and Naulleau. We understand the views of each. Let's move on!
