And similar to the megapixels, you should not be here too distracted by the oh-so gigantic resolution. De facto, this guarantee is not reached, and even if it would be at a maximum format of A3 +, as if you shoot using a sledgehammer to crack a nut. My Epson 3880, with "lean" 2880 dpi, bring any case visibly better results out. Especially in the field black and white, this unit remains well below expectations - and the full-bodied advertising - back. Semi-professional maintenance.
As for the results, so the device is obviously geared without great effort, to achieve acceptable results directly from JPGs. Of course you can also work here with ink and paper profiles, but need not be. Simply send the pictures of the kit cam to the printer and be glad.
The processing is certainly very valuable - if only the 9 Kg weight speak for themselves - the setup and operation very simple and the idea of being able to integrate the device into the network wirelessly, very nice. A little less beautiful are the enclosed ink cartridges, because we are dealing only with the normal size and not recommended by Canon XL cartridges. If the device only once flushed and ready for use, loose 25-30% of ink are probably disappeared from the cartridges. Even if the course is valid for all inkjet printers, stayed here but the impression that the cartridges were not really delivered the brim.
Conclusion: Who does not want to bother with major technical parameters and print at the touch pictures that almost look like on the camera monitor, for this printer is certainly a good choice. Quite cheap it is not natural, but when you consider that the comparable professional device from Canon will cost more than double ...
