The Olympus OM-D series has a quick, tref fischeren autofocus and
just fun! She has a smaller sensor, so that the same panel
more depth of field (which need not be a disadvantage), a bit worse
Noise performance and a lower resolution than the A6000.
The Olympus lenses are very expensive. The same applies to Panasonic MFT series.
Here I like also the JPGs from the camera.
The Fuji X-series has problems with the autofocus. The lenses are great,
but also very expensive. The operation is more for the advanced
Photographer. The sensor is great, the JPGs from the camera are really great!
Who makes a lot of long-term exposures in the evening, you should look in more detail here!
The Sony a7 series (full-frame) is great, but more expensive than the A6000,
the autofocus is poor - and there are only a small selection - also expensive -
Lenses. In addition, the system is larger and heavier than the A6000.
Canon and Nikon have developed in my opinion, completely in the market over!
The EOS-M and the Nikon J-series were (deliberately?) Poorly constructed and
can with the current cameras from Sony, Fuji, Olympus, Panasonic no
Area points!
The Sony A6000 offers full 24-megapixel resolution, an extremely fast autofocus
and costs only about 650 euros with kit lens.
There are a variety of affordable lenses, including from Sigma.
The electronic viewfinder can not be used at the level of the Olympus E-M1, but when
you no longer recognizes on the display.
Only criticism: The Blendenwahlrad adjusted quite right on the housing
you like to unintentionally. It should be locked (see Olympus E-M1).
Anyone thinking, to buy an entry-level SLR or system camera should
the A6000 consider and test! The A6000 is a perfect all-rounder with
Reserves for the future!
