The road route to get to the hike: Instead of giving a motorway exit number, the guide gives the name of the toll. Bad luck for us because there is already a mistake here in the guide: we had to take the exit before the famous toll that commits us in the wrong direction.
The directions and names then given to the itinerary are not on the road signs there, it makes us circling a moment to know where to go. The information on the itinerary they have been verified on the spot? in any case it is not reliable.
The starting point of the hike: Can not find the reference guide being impossible to find on the spot because no signage. Example impractical: The guide indicates a barrier when there are three different locally leading to 3 different paths to do when the guide does not signal the others?
The actual hike through many intersections where it is not possible to go straight: the guide does not speak and does impasse of these steps. I said that this hike is not so good luck markup!
When we find a place we are sure (example be at or guide the photo was taken), it only takes a few minutes for the indications of the guide no longer correspond to what we see on the ground. Sacred galley!
These cards in the guide are inaccurate and have no caption: ign would need a map and compass to compensate for decorative cards (and unnecessary) guide.
However, the guide is aesthetically pleasing and makes you want to discover on the spot these hikes, we may have had no luck in choosing the No. 26. We got lost following the directions, the path to gr proximity has allowed us to make a round trip and find the car ...
Under the guise of apparent simplicity, this guide is therefore dangerous for inexperienced hikers: the delay due to the visibly unaudited route involves starting hiking in the sun, the rest unreliable and ambiguous indication may get lost easily without reliable indication to catch the circuit in case of problems.
