Although the software has many web tools (slide, feedback form, integration of YouTube or Flash videos and about 20 more finesse) with itself, are designed results in fact not "state of the art". They often look clunky, so the W2D-Designbiblothek proposes equal before several layouts in which the pretentious title header is only 300 pixels high. Just look at the header of this page. Amazon comes out with a quarter. And no matter through which layout templates you zap: Always color combinations are half-baked, font sizes can not be changed at all and very much being too static.
For the club's website that might be enough, or for the amateur photographer who wants to show his amateur photos to the public, but an architect's office, an agency or a freelancer need more neutrality, more simplicity on their websites, and that is not the strength of W2D.
The generated with W2D 6.0 websites act in layout often clunky, headers are larger than life, color combinations can be changed only very limited, font sizes and colors without editing the HTML code does not usually.
A Flash video in the header of your site? The centering of the page layout on the monitor? Forget it! Indeed, there is in the user-guided W2D Internet forum for each problem afloat the right answer, but these tricks usually require good knowledge of HTML and a lot of effort.
On the plus side is that the software is very stable and almost error-free. Actually unfortunate to mention this extra out of the experience, however, I know that this is certainly not a foregone conclusion.
My tip: Buy another WebGenerator. With Webeasy can already create very appealing websites for very little money. And Webplus X2 creates the almost same result performance at half the price.
