Demanding with small defects

For the past two weeks I use the "Einstein Brain Trainer HD" in principle every day and put me in the first place an increased ambition determined to achieve the highest possible scores in the various disciplines.

It makes a lot of fun, in the morning on the way to work or during the day if the opportunity arises, perhaps spend five minutes daily test to look at how close you are to the maximum of 10,000 points (four exercises in "daily can be to complete test "in which a maximum of 2500 points reached) will come, and what title a imparts the program then.
Since all exercises "go time" and incorrect answers mean point deduction, one can speak of a consistently high standard, it is so close ambitious to reach the 2500 points.
Depending on the score achieved, has a program a title like "wise owl" or "smarter Professor" to.

Only the sense of attention issues which arise in apparently irregular intervals (about once every two days) does not open up to me.
In this you are required to select from four images or pay a certain. Is it so wrong, which I think in the first experiments for very likely For my part, the correct answer will be marked green briefly, after which the Einstein Cartoon you regrets. Since repeat these questions attention after a few days, it is quite common to be right after several attempts. This is rewarded with praise, without an indication of the background of these questions.

The individual exercises are designed very varied, and offer of a shell game on mental arithmetic to a confusing car race in which the survey in terms of position of the private car in demand is a lot of variety.

Only an exercise that has already been criticized by several other speakers also I would like to emphasize once again as a negative example. It is here called loud and clear as soon as possible to include up to a certain number, as Example 60, and then automatically stop the stopwatch.

During the "Daily Test" provides a with a title and a green marking on the respective day on the calendar, there is the possibility to attend a "training", which as well as the points from four randomly selected exercises added to check how close you to 10000 points coming.
In addition, almost any exercise can be independent of other start individually. The already mentioned "schnellzähl exercise" I have not found me, as an exercise in which one is called cube as quickly as possible to include in a three dimensional space. Both exercises were my only rare times on the "Daily Test" accessible.

A feature that I have noticed funnily enough only during the writing of this review, which is achieved by achievements. For example, the fact that you completed a certain number of "daily tests" in one piece or answered a number questions correctly attention and achieving a certain score in "daily tests".
Like in turn is rewarded with trophies (bronze, silver, gold), a system that in addition to individual score also evaluates the performance in each exercise.

The program runs only in portrait mode, but provides the opportunity to focus in the screen segment to the right or left to bring up there comments, information or other features via the tapping of the already mentioned Einstein's (left), or his assistant "Robo" (right) ,

Apart from the "schnellzähl exercise" me three more points are still misbehaving.
On the one hand you have every time before the program can use after a start wait until "Einstein" has risen from his chair in the background and the player is located (although it takes only a few seconds, but is regarded by me as a waste of time) on the other hand, one often bothered by Absolvierens a workout or a 'daily test "a full-screen engaging advertisement for another application of" BBG Entertainment GmbH ".
At least this can be immediately after the animated and perhaps lasting a scant second display, remove the tapping by an "X".

Another and the last point of criticism concerns a mistake in one of the exercises.
For a better understanding I describe the systematics same short here.
It is about the well-known game Rock Paper Scissors. Either here a symbol (a hand as, stone scissors or paper) or two symbols are displayed with a corresponding command.

Three examples:

A symbol: scissors - you lose!

Two symbols: Stone + scissors - Beat the losers!

Two symbols: paper - stone - not Win against the symbols!

As you can imagine, this is demanded from the three down again displayed symbols, the right to find out and to tap.
In the following case, however, I have already stated twice that the game is programmed here in error:

"Stone (left), paper (right) - Lose against loser!"

I typed while the right result (scissors) to me corrected the program and recommended that I "stone".

Even if the signs he has become not occupied little space, these are just a small thing that has even a minimal influence on my vote.

I hope I could provide a brief overview here. My conclusion is that the 3 have paid off for this, even if the defects mentioned tarnish the pleasure of something.