Firstly the composition of this shampoo is chemical, such as standard dil 20 years ago Dailleurs can sétonner Mixa that keeps this kind of formula as its main target are the babies, and that many of its competitors make it a point of honor to offer natural ingredients, hypoallergenic, bio, etc.
Note that Mixa Baby offers a "hypo-allergenic" version of this shampoo, recognizable by its white cap, but I have not yet been able to test it.
Similarly, baby Mixa Dermatologist and ophthalmologist tested her shampoo, as was commonly there for years. That is to say that he has so much chemistry there in that they must sassurer with laboratory animals, it will not create a pesky skin reaction Whereas if one does not put natural ingredients in it, there is no need to ny do tests on laboratory animals Dailleurs many organic products make it clear "not tested on animals"
The problem is that this chemical composition is even felt in the smell of shampoo, which is unpleasant and pharmaceutical This reassures probably this big category of mothers who are focused on the hygiene and germs and not on the product composition (then than any shampoo foam guarantees the hygiene!), but it is not pleasant.
Only positive point in my eyes;
1) It is effective: the hair very shiny spring
2) its concentrated and very thick formula prevents the liquid shampoo too falls in the eye
A final point to watch: Mixa baby, like its direct competitor Garnier Ultra Doux (which at least he tries to original perfumes, varied, enjoyable), makes small bottles, 250 ml only, whereas many others ( Petit Marseillais, Larbre Green) have bottles of 300 ml! So be careful to compare the price per liter if you hesitate between 2 shampoos
