... Among monitor manufacturers (so the longstanding Image) I expected more. Caveat: I have returned to the part and a HP Z24i ordered that fits, the main reason is the PWM control on the Eizo below 20%, because I realized that I would have more than 20% brightness !!! Because it brings me nothing, when 0-20% PWM are controlled, I have in fact felt bad at 18% brightness and several hours before the PC, the HP that was not like that. I must say that the HP Z24i at the lowest brightness level probably not much darker than the 20% the Eizo because so seems to be a Stromgrneze with which you can regulate LEDs. But I will definitely have no PWM, at PRAD It will also be compared to the HP-line is quite smooth on the chart (0-100%), while the Eizo characteristic (20-100%) is slightly serrated, the like be a delicacy, but I subjectively I feel before the HP not nervous or uncomfortable, while the Eizo with 20% (also not yet PWM) as subjectively emerged after a long time already unwell. When I had the HP Z24i and have noticed that the not much Dunlkler is adjustable (a shade darker, perhaps), as the Eizo with about 20%, I thought only if it perhaps was a mistake to send back the Eizo, but it was not, for the following main reasons: - HP is much cheaper - The HP is in my opinion much sharper in image and VA. Font - The HP comes with calibration software that is top notch, just awesome, then the part is perfectly adjusted, is at Eizo this respect nothing wrong, you can buy more than what. Well there are many light-free calibration software? The would but never as good as the HP built-in functions with storage and profiles etc. - I have noticed that the Eizo EcoView and EcoSense not working properly and totally annoying and in the end I had turned it all, especially when you want low brightness, makes no sense. I had specially bought Eizo, as it was called at PRAD that these functions when Eizo compared to the competition work best. So people may be, but not good enough! Anyone can check yourself, just buy it and return it, easily. I found very important at the beginning, now I know that only the manual setting is the best auto-brightness can be fully forgotten as too imprecise and still too light 'or not as you want it. The HP has not this functionality, so I did not pay them well, super. - The HP software I like better than the Eizo software, which is a shame for Eizo because the loud Image's your thing
A negative point to HP, which strikes me personally as the only: Compared with the Eizo HP has not directly on the monitor pushbuttons with which you can change various profiles quickly, eg User1 is set to dark and user2 to brighter for games and Moviez. At HP I have since about the software in the system tray change is basically no problem, but it takes just a little longer, that was the Eizo very pleasant.
From an EIZO I have a computer already in Teenag lifetime dream, well-knowing, so I thought it was the ne plus ultra, Now I was able to a last and sent him back, I would have let me in life never dreamed.
My conclusion: All the better, because I save money in the future and when to offer LG or Samsung also clever monitors without PWM, then I buy the same directly in which a monitor, because the place indeed the IPS or PLS panels forth, buy from those Yes, most manufacturers the panels. So three stars for the Eizo, because it is basically a very good monitor, but a star deduction is or incorporated because of the high price and a further star deduction, because the functions EcoView and EcoSense are simply NonSense and because no calibration is doing.
