Bel and (fairly) good storage system

The aesthetic of this small piece of furniture is quite successful and tasteful, given its low price. All interior, even the classics can live with the appearance of wood. Furthermore, the weight of each piece of furniture is not an exaggeration, and secondly you can easily stack several safely imbalance.

I do not come back to the relative fragility of the delivery system and disc ejection spoken of by the other commentators. However arises another problem that designers of this article are not responsible. To make myself understood, I compare it with the furniture for audio cassettes. The cassette case was standardized size, if you exclude Fuji that were thinner. The design of the cassette furniture was simple. But it is not so in the case of CDs. CD boxes in this piece suitable for a standard commercial CD or double current CD, but not to multiple CD albums (even more than the thickness of the added problem of the width when there on a case-card), or to the old design double CD, much thicker. These, you should ask them elsewhere, for example on the furniture!

It is the same for CD recorded by yourself (do not tell me you do not have one ...). In general, we go two CDs (slim size) in a single box (each cabinet can therefore contain 120) or more with CDs protected by a cardboard sleeve; but especially in the latter case, you get peinerez as enclosures are well maintained. So your home registration CD may be forever crooked, you embêterez to put the CD after listening, their place being occupied by those above that collapsed. As the number of CDs that fit into each of the four units will never be the same, I advise to leave as a precaution an empty space at the top of each property, also in the case of CDs recorded by yourself. Well, it's not a catastrophe, but one wonders whether Hama should not offer the same small storage, with more robust interior walls, but ... simply devoid of boxes.