How to say ... huge inconsistencies (a veterinarian -who also disappear from the story- and falling asleep at the scene of a crime), a cop who goes through a "skylight" (in 1920 !! ! ... especially when we know that it is a mark ^^) and opens from inside a locked door (while occupying left with), an innkeeper who steals roof to roof, but nobody knows why ... well the list goes on and best !!! Other big big problem, the "Wikipedia" in the text. Either we learn many things on Wikipedia ... but then to have the impression that we read a condensed in a thriller ... NO! I sometimes had the feeling that whole pieces were taken so the integration of information was not good. My question is: Does anyone have the text read back in 10/18? Because the author had his story (she is not to blame ... hence my consolation 2 stars) but then to pass up with such nonsense, it's a shame :(
