TV: Panasonic Viera TX-P50GT30E
Player: PS3
Property me also specially still the original Panasonic glasses fetched (TY-EW3D2ME).
Processing and appearance:
Here wins, as one would naturally expect the Pana glasses.
Is nobler and better quality processed.
The no-name acts like a discounter glasses. But not like scrap (both are not claret as I have read it in another Rezesion).
The switches are OK, but not dibasic.
But honestly, the switch Pressing once, and a beauty contest you win with none.
Scope:
Pana is in a box. Universal in bag. Anyway, I put the glasses on the sideboard.
Charging cable are both here. Pana cable is shorter, I think (I have not torn pack ...)
Additional scope only universal: various essays nose and a lens cloth (one could also expect at Pana ...).
Guide was at Universal with me only in English and Chinese. But what little anyone can decipher.
Connection:
The Pana went immediately.
The universal must be synchronized with the 2.ten button.
Worked only at 2.ten times. Can also on TV or have been lying to me.
Comfort:
Light advantage Pana.
Function:
Property me therefore especially the Pana fetched. I did the 3D in a 2D conversion usually too little.
But could find both no difference. The best you can see it in fonts / overlays.
Then test with "Batman - Arkham City" on the PS3. 3D effect works in both.
Also in the film "Cloudy With a Chance of Meatballs (3D Version)" both worked tadelos.
The real quality I can not test, such as TV's with test images. When switching of both glasses I noticed no difference. Possibly Universal is NEN Tick yellowish. Can also be imagination.
Plus Universal: It turns itself off if it gets no more infrared messages.
Conclusion:
Give the Pana back. One gets cheaper 2 glasses with Universal. It fulfills what it is and is not ugly.
Who attaches importance to looks, buys for the saved rather NEN sweater)
But 3D at the movies (or at much larger diagonal) is still better.
