entertaining without rashes

... The unnamed opponent turns out to be an opponent and not quite taken seriously childish prank: the kidnapping of a cute little animal on one side and the counter kidnapping of a Bonsai on the other hand lets us smile; o)

Skinny shows his nasty streak and foppt Bob - and it shows to the conclusion that he also has a good core under the rough exterior, he just could not unfold because he was well-cast too little ...

For me, this result means pleasant conversation. The comparison with the "Silver Spider" is close - although here some lack of investigative work exists -like the "Revenge of the Samurai", but with significantly more content and better dialogue.

We learn new: Peter does not like hot cross buns * * Schmunzel
And Bob seems to be probably Amnesiegefährdet since the silver spider.
This time there is no Justus teachings, the main roles are clearly assigned to Bob and skinny, which makes the story interesting at least in perspective.

It almost seems that the following -zusammenfassend- fans do not like all the (Alt):
- Too few goal-oriented case-based dialogues of three
- To illogical designed "riddle"
- To be involved to rapid reconnaissance "at a stroke" at the end without the chance throughout history. That may be the main reason why many avid listeners -ehemals- today rend the new episodes:
You feel in case solution too little involved. And that was indeed what made the old episodes so interesting! Step-by-step one was led by the action.
An investigation of the case at the headquarters, the summary of findings - the missing ...

Should we return to the 45 minutes and leave "Fülldialoge"? Maybe this is also a key point why the "old" were interesting?
Today the story is cast in narrative style using the handset. Often without ups and downs that can "cheer". Point. End ...

This is like the crime, in which appear in the last pages characters that you did not mention the book on which then are essential but to educate ...
"Murder by Death" Greetings!

Nevertheless, the speakers are great and who know how to entertain.
If that's not enough, the need to write their own case; o)

I would be so interested to know how the three voice actors, narrators besides, think "new" stories about the quality of the: o)