The antiglare one is a bit disadvantage
one, but that is out of proportion to the benefit. On the one hand
is the readability again better since no reflections.
And secondly (imho almost more important) you now have peace with the
Prints and smeared the phone! Should you nevertheless times
see some fat (what stands out far less), extends a short
Wiping and everything is back on track.
The highlight: The film does not have to be free of grease, so that they re-
looks perfect. It is enough - so stupid it may sound - if the
Residual fat "uniformly distributed" is. Sounds unclean, but we're talking
only by ordinary tracks as they leave nunmal.
Basically, it is so that at halfway dry fingers do not
only visible traces arise. However, what is unchangeable: The film
is a consumable item, at some point you will use the mark in the form
see scratches.
But until that happens, goes a little while, and if so, then I'm doing
make a new plan.
Speaking draufmachen: The advantage of a waterproof cellular is: A
Film fabrication under running water is risk-free and also almost
foolproof because virtually dust-free *. : O)
* Almost because even in the water once a particles could be in there.
But compared to the normal, usually dust geschwängerten environment is the
no comparison!