If 2.0 is better than 2.1

We read so much about these speakers in the network. Much good. I can only confirm this. The sound is really excellent. When I think of how expensive candidates from hell, Creative and co I struggled myself. Even 5.1, where I had always wanted too much, sometimes too weak the bass.
Now I wanted to do without a subwoofer, because I had to have a neighbor with such a system, the pleasure. You can hear this part and it sucks when you should be resting. The boxes offer an absolutely ausgewogenens sound and can also be customized as required. I have for example the bass control is set quite low. It is so harmonious for me.

So these two dream boxes come along. An active and a passive box. Operated by the internal amplifier the right box. The sound is so far unbeaten in its price range for me and the processing is absolutely high quality. The feel is a dream come true. Sometimes I want to take off the grid, but do not want the speakers start to collect dust. : D

The remote is minimalist, but does absolutely their purpose. Mute, volume, silent.

The only drawback: It is not known whether one is already at the maximum volume, because there is no tangible end. Has neither the FB nor the control dial, which, incidentally, a noticeable small lock on certain positions.

On the desk, they look great too. However, they are also not the smallest, but now I've got enough space for.

Conclusion: Highly recommended unrestricted, looking for all the a super 2.0 speakers. Also for those looking for a 2.1 set. Try it dear hereby. You will not regret it. 5.1 speaker I find generally overvalued. The spatial experience ok, but for movies and co I do not need that. If you like time plays the shooter and he thinks need 5.1, then I can as a former pro gamers say: utter rubbish. I have always played with a 2.0 stereo headset by Sennheiser and have always known at any time, from where the opponent is. That's why you play something with headphones and not with boxes.