Me personally, but this does not interfere with genu to return to enter the pocket. Because otherwise it is of good quality, the leatherette holds good, does not smell and is vernähnt tidy. All buttons and ports are easily accessible, the flap conceals the on / off button of the phone. The Lumia 520 fits well into the plastic container and is firmly held by the overhanging plastic edges. The magnetic closure is sewn (ie no open metal) and keeps the bag reliably closed. Since the tab on the back closes, the bag is not in the normal position (mobile screen upwards) up to, but is always slightly askew. The small pockets on the inside I do not use (so far). Since there also leatherette is verwendt, one finds the pattern partly as a mark on the mobile phone display (instead of fingerprints) again.
Without the almost insolence to be named company name embossed, which is not available in the pictures, this would be a good buy with proper price / performance ratio and full marks. But if there is this significant rate.
Supplement on 07.12.2013 due to the commentary of the manufacturer (?):
In fact, I have after some searching, the name embossed in the specified images 2 and 3 found, because I knew where to look. Only 3 image is enlarged and can be for me a recognition halfway to. This can certainly be due to the black color of the shell.
I think it is still in the figures for hard to see that the shell has a name embossed and would therefore appreciate it if this would be clearly mentioned in the product description text. It is legitimate for the maker to raise its logo on its products, but the buyer should recognize this in advance appropriate and can learn and then make a choice.
Otherwise it is as already described to a good product, which has proven itself in practical use so far, and with which I am satisfied otherwise. Therefore, upgrading to 4 points. 5 points when naming the name embossed in the product description.