Is it possible to have, do not have to. Good but not a must

Design - Packaging
The packaging of the bottle looks very very classy. The copper / bronze blends beautifully with the black and reflects the light through the diamond-shaped embossed beautiful. Aside from the logo additionally visible details are very discreet delineated structurally at the bottom (no embossing of the background), the font color slightly darker than the background itself and therefore very inconspicuous (what should be a praise here!). Artisan minimalism for a quality design

Flacon
Inside the elegant-looking pack the flacon hides. Also inside the contrast is maintained: apricot-colored color of the inside of the box, embedding of the bottle in a matte black box. The Flacon the known through the packaging design will again. In width round, flattened in the depths (of course?) With a smooth portion toward opening which distinguishes itself sharply from the diamond structure, the impression is created of necklines. The black of the glass is very dark, thus leaves no light reflections to (very bad!), A semi-transparent glass would have been determined with the interesting touch! The level can be here only guess, if you hold the bottle directly into the light. The somewhat brief cover looks a bit lngweilig, is made of plastic and sits well and stable on. Adorned he is by a ring in bronze / copper / rose gold. General bother me in the cover scents. Often very pompous, often carelessly / expedient. Right here you will access as highlights or thoughts would be appropriate in the creation. Bonnetless would be great, or at least one bracket to the flacon. Next negative I feel the smooth area that is quickly decorated fingerprints (see mobile phone display). Once settles also dust the exterior of the fragrance unfortunately affects so wertig as its packaging by far nowhere near. From a distance, one could also emanate from a Plastikflacon (Once-through glass darkly, the same ground, to take away, please!)

Fragrance
What I expected: I was expecting a fragrance that reflects what Bond women radiate for me. These are femininity, seduction, assertiveness, strength, sensuality. Just so must be a 007 fragrance. Heavy, little to no sweet, distinctive and present, long-adhesive it should be. Have that certain something. The first smell I had expected a lot more strength, less sweetness and more austere, perhaps even more masculine notes. Woods, musk, such in the foreground.

The first impression:
In this fragrance, I find it very hard to describe him. In summary, I would say in one sentence "I like it, but is nothing special.". Oriental he is, as expected, definitely, but at the same time sweet and floral. Powdery not. Herb actually not. Since it lacks the penetrating gravity (who knows Alien is hardened), I find him universally. For everyday, to go shopping as well as for going out.

Shelf life:
Freshly applied it is a long time a significant presence. I would say to one hour after application (1 spray on neckline) as it is for me and others still perceptible in the surrounding area. But from then on I feel more "naked". For an Eau de Parfum too little, in my opinion. Longer shelf life and greater strength would have been useful for me.

My fragrance Conclusion:
I lack the desired edged, that special something that certain. The makings of a classic has not 007 For Women, however, you can already smell even think if you want to change from his usual scents. I like him, but he did not blows me away. I feel also not surrounded by it, which may be positive for some. I however wish of a Eau de Parfum that one perceives it as well. Myself it falls on only when fresh, after some time, I feel, however, "scentless" what the meaning of "bond Aura" is not that it should create.
Herber, masculine I would also have liked him. The black pepper, white musk and cedar are only guessing for me or not to smell out. Could love be stronger.

In summary: Not a bad creation but not an exceptional "must-have" that you would recognize immediately.