Ok, the pants arrived, tried, stylish cut at the waist and legs, but the length of it looked more like a flood pants off ... a few centimeters it was too short.
So be returned and exchanged for M. What came next was ... well everything but not M. Good, M but is it the cut was a joke, because I would have 2x fit in your pants! The pants are cut so generously wide on the leg, as the federal government and without a belt she slips immediately. The pants length was ok for now ... For me, the pants are so unfortunately prohibitive, also M I must return again and notice that there is no such pants in my size.
Whether the pants fit well, depends heavily on the "wealth" from. Lean people must not be larger than about 1,73m so S fits. Who is greater, but should then also at least 85kg weigh up, so she sits topless in size M.
The quality of the pants is ok. A little thinner than I expected. Who so often stirs in the garden or crawls on all fours through the grounds, which is probably not long enjoy it, for a leisure or hobby pants (photographer and co) but it should be sufficient.
The difference from S to M is not equal measures, therefore probably partially conflicting reviews. I do not want to know how far probably the XL or XXL may turn out variant! I can of trousers only give 2 stars (for the appearance, in S saw namely pretty cool). The color incidentally corresponds to the product photo.
