Light and shadow 39

First short report: The pictures all look better than my Canon SX50HS !!!!!!!! Better contrast, better colors, and even in the higher ISO levels not half bad! Although noisier, but also has a lot more details, almost no chroma. Stabilizer ++! 1 / 60s at 1440mm in it! Simply the better lens.
But the old grief: The camera is still far too slow. Focus is far too slow and everything you do take. Why not build a faster processor ????? If the camera real lift to the top position. So come while waiting to the next image no real joy to ......

Supplement with downgrade to 3 stars: Although the lens quality is outstanding, the camera with a heavy heart returns. The autofocus is soooo slow and work in low light really only in WW properly. Even otherwise, the camera is too slow, that fun can come. Also the viewfinder is unfortunately grottenschlecht. Unfortunately, like a lot lately Nikon attracts a great concept not by right. I think everyone interested photographer would 50-100 lie more to get a super-Bridge, but somehow every company is afraid diee 500 threshold to crack and saves on the wrong end. Conclusion: Better processor + = better viewfinder Super camera. too bad !!

PS: Anyone who wants to live with the limitations, gets a camera with excellent image quality.