Lightweight, super detailed, spatially - weaknesses in Bass

The 880 is relatively light and high-quality workmanship and can be stowed flat. Neoprene storage bag, 3m cable (sound better) and 1.2m cable with microphone here. The flat design are larger ears easily to the membrane. The shield against the environment is good. Its sound is very detailed and is a closed headphone good stage again, so playing in space. The bass is a bit overcast in the background, not as detailed and somewhat more slowly than the rest of the spectrum and, unfortunately, does not fit so homogenous in its sound like a Audio Technica MSR-7, which provides better worlds bass quality, but the Quantity and space are for lower. It lacks the 880 and the bass and the bass drum of a drum set so sounds more like 18 "instead of 22".

In total package to me, the 880 but still liked it better, also because he is a little height-heavy headphones (matter of taste) and transients reproduces so well from the centers to the heights. Who more neutrality (a little more bass, less treble) examined should also possibly hear the YAMAHA MT220, who has very small ears should the Focal Spirit Classic or Pro taste (very small earpieces but super sound). The following expensive closed headphones I found worse: Beyerdynamic T5p (heavier, bigger, more sober slightly tinny sound), Fostex TH600 (large, inflated the bass masked the centers), Shure SRH1540 (dull, slow, poor differentiation of instruments)

Before making a judgment should therefore be the absolutely 880 from 250 hours to play about 10 days continuously, as the tone, but especially the bass changed for the better. Also, one should in time the 880 is a very broad subject of terminals because the pressing force otherwise extremely high.