This book is a revenge, is to destroy a politician and a very short man. A vengeance exercised by a woman with questionable mental health, a narcissistic exercise a pathologically jealous woman of the woman she took the man (which is already not trivial) and believed she could influence a politician elected president of the republic no less! It should not have all these minds to be able to believe that! Returning to the book, its contents puts uncomfortable, as voyeurism, privacy have spread blew me whole passages I was so disgusted at times. Then what veracity give these writings? Finally we have only his word to believe but what else? Nothing, she has done yardstick promotion, has faced no opponent or journalist of any kind whatsoever, his strategy was short: "I let my bomb and I take the money." Result: a president humiliated as a man who can attack in the courts for libel because of its function and its design and power trierweiler knew it before so it's not courage that suffocates. Those who hate Holland, will find confirmation of their hatred, his supporters find this disgusting, nothing new under the sun finally. But I'd only enlighten readers about the personality of Valerie trierweiler, obscure political journalist paris match which only the good looks set her apart from others. In 2007 Francois Hollande Segolene Royal leaves for her, the couple was on the rocks for years. Trierwiller due would be happy, not because it has developed a jealousy / pathological hatred against Royal, Why? Because it was the first wife, the mother of his children and that it exercises the same job and so they are brought to intersect in addition to simply household contacts, and Royal trierweiller would erase his existence, it is a childish immature feeling immature and who will go far, it is forbidden to present the death of the mother of Holland, it is forbidden to present at the inauguration to the presidency (which will result in the refusal of Holland children and their refusal to come review trierweiller), then yes the president was in a bad mood that day, it was enough and it was his fault. By cons, it this ostensibly will stage like no joint chairman had done. And then there was the matter of the tweet because lÉlysée had supported at least, Ségolène Royal and than had been kept! Immature, disproportionate, you think? Yes you are right. Madam, not content to give its opinion on the formation of the government, it imposed its views, asking edicts on certain personalities she was not wearing her heart and vice versa elsewhere (Rebsamen, for example) it was she who was elected? No, but that's what she thinks. She is very attached to his private life, is suing the newspapers in the past lends a relationship with an elected right, gain 60000, you kids do with privacy in trierwieller. So Holland does not see his former girlfriend, her children, she keeps the name of her former husband and Holland rubs her children without problems. And pui came the break, one can effectively argue about how it was dropped, I admit, but it was not found in the street, it occupies the apartment she shared with Holland he always pays rent and pays financial support for children who are not of it! Not bad for someone cynically, who does not love the poor short a bastard. I am sad and quite a distaste for trierweiller, it has never been up to the status of "first lady" not even the journalist level, against the psychiatric level it has the level of sick, no problem. Now you and I know who you have to do so you are free to do your opinion, as the world of politics, mine was made before reading this book and reading only reinforced my opinion of his author, a bad journalist, a woman unable to assume its role and a narcissistic pathological jealousy and temperamental.
