But I can make my equipment load quickly, previously depended on it:
- Amazon Kindle Keyboard
- Apple iPod Classic 6.2
- Google Nexus 7 2013 4G
- Samsung Galaxy S Plus 'GT-I9001'
- OnePlus One 'A001'
Were all quite quickly loaded, whether the batteries will do the best I can not judge the theory indeed states that in modern LiIon batteries, control electronics on the device side to ensure that harmful currents can not occur. In the instructions booklet is expressly pointed out that the charger does not exceed a maximum current of the device under load.
The packaging is made conspicuously consuming, easy to open. Drin is the charger, a Euro cable ("EN 50075" to "IEC 60320 C7") with about 1.5 length and attached Velcro cable ties. Charger and cable are in my case know. Furthermore, there is a small multilingual instruction booklet, a small leaflet "Happy / Not Happy" with an explanation of how the manufacturer can contact and a small map with extractable content, the one I should be rather meaningless advertising.
So far everything super, only the instructions could have been a bit more extensive. So is me as I said not clear what should be the difference in the ports now, I suspect that the non-IQ ports can deliver a lower maximum current. Unfortunately, this is not apparent from the instructions out because there is not entered exactly to the specifications of each port.
My hope with the manufacturer on the Internet ([...]) to be able to find is unfortunately also come to nothing. Since it is then even so that you only get a product photo while attempting a manual to download.
Conclusion:
Bill to be a good charger, but the documentation could be improved and that is why a star deduction.
