Here you can surely up to 600, - EUR to spend and then gets very light yet sturdy carbon fiber tripods.
In the class to 100, - EUR It is a bit more closely when searching stability - especially if you read the product reviews and tests, you will find quite a lot of "junk".
I am now landed the "Rollei Compact Traveler No. I" and can confirm that it (eg 24-70 or 70-200) holds a full-blown DSLR pretty good lens. For longer focal lengths (eg the 70-200) yes the tripod head on the tripod mount is to be mounted on the lens - so again the exact center of the weight distribution ...
For users with 300-1000mm lenses could already be difficult like this lightweight find
If it is windy or come with someone longer focal lengths are used, one must it not necessarily "exit" to the maximum 140cm and can thus grazilsten, lowest segments avoid the tripod legs.
A full-frame weighs Spielgereflexkamera incl. 70-200 / 2.8 = 3223g. When I think about that home Manfrotto ball head = 1486g würder use, arising 4609g ... for the Rollei with 5kg load capacity should theoretically be enough so ... However, at Rollei Tripod is already a (slight) ball head about to the its purpose relatively safe erfülllt?
After all, it makes no sense a tripod with 1340g take you on a journey and to use a tripod head that weighs more than the stand ... that would be doing as the racing cyclists whose wheel zwichen 6 ... weighs 9kg and Castles have that again bring the same thing on the scale to be able to secure good care of the expensive wheel :-)
CONCLUSION: My recommendation - it does what it promises, has an ultra-small pack size and price for the indicated an extremely low weight.
