not a very good interpretation

I know four versions of the concerto for piano schnittke, this one is the one I like the least. I do not like it because the pianist to hit very hard, as if she was playing piano pieces come from the school of, that is to say some research objectivity and an effort to purge all lyricism. as the tempo is very slow at what else does not bother me but here the emphasis is on the passages "lyrical" the piano and it really artificial way. Finally, the strings are not bad but not good either, it is fairly flat. I do not comment on other rooms, just a short period of atonal schnittke before he found his voice.

I personally would recommend the interpretation of Nikolai Petrov (Piano)
Evgeny Svetlanov (Conductor) Sinfonie Orchester and Staaliches der USSR (found in cd only on youtube) pianist made totally out the side "somnanbulesque" of the piece and the strings are flamboyant and have a very rich sound. Then you can also try the Honourable execution of
Arcady Shteinlukht and St. Petersburg Mozarteum Chamber Orchestra but the cd is especially (for me) for the concerto grosso No. 1, which is a nice balance between "wild" interpretations and wisest of the concerto.

Finally, a small description of the concerto for those who knew not, it's a room where there is polystylistic of beethevon sonata moonlight, the rachmaninov and atonality. it is one of the pieces that have a fairly direct impact.